<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 15 RPGs of All Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time</link>
	<description>Gaming lore from the gaming vanguard.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vox</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-48874</link>
		<dc:creator>vox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-48874</guid>
		<description>Terrible list that attempts to seem well thought out by being different. Placement of FF7 is fine, who cares. But then you have games like Deus Ex above it which shouldn&#039;t even be on the list. Or Diablo which is clearly inferior to Diablo II and shouldn&#039;t be in the top 5 regardless. And no mention of the elder scrolls series at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible list that attempts to seem well thought out by being different. Placement of FF7 is fine, who cares. But then you have games like Deus Ex above it which shouldn&#8217;t even be on the list. Or Diablo which is clearly inferior to Diablo II and shouldn&#8217;t be in the top 5 regardless. And no mention of the elder scrolls series at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 11 Video Game Endings &#124; Old-Wizard.com</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-48111</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 11 Video Game Endings &#124; Old-Wizard.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-48111</guid>
		<description>[...] word; &#8220;Epic&#8221;. It&#8217;s not a coincidence that many of the selections in this list are RPG&#8217;s. When playing these massive games, it was only logical for there to be massive endings, and this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] word; &#8220;Epic&#8221;. It&#8217;s not a coincidence that many of the selections in this list are RPG&#8217;s. When playing these massive games, it was only logical for there to be massive endings, and this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longbow_Archer</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-45804</link>
		<dc:creator>Longbow_Archer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-45804</guid>
		<description>Well I can partialy agree on that Emerald Magus. Stories can become a huge advantage a game can have over its competitors however since the game industry seems attempt to dethrone other kinds of forms of entertainment.Indeed, the best way to experience a story is via a book. And yes, sadly not many people do that nowadays. Still, I think it&#039;s not bad to have more story-heavy games. Especially those with an insane amount of replay value. I&#039;m going to add Dragon Age to the ones I already mentioned in my previous post therefore. Imoen and Minsc are epic !!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I can partialy agree on that Emerald Magus. Stories can become a huge advantage a game can have over its competitors however since the game industry seems attempt to dethrone other kinds of forms of entertainment.Indeed, the best way to experience a story is via a book. And yes, sadly not many people do that nowadays. Still, I think it&#8217;s not bad to have more story-heavy games. Especially those with an insane amount of replay value. I&#8217;m going to add Dragon Age to the ones I already mentioned in my previous post therefore. Imoen and Minsc are epic !!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMGLIEKFF7</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-45277</link>
		<dc:creator>OMGLIEKFF7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-45277</guid>
		<description>OMG FF7 IS THE BESTESTESTESTESTETS EVERS. 


Anyways, Good list. I thoroughly enjoy that unlike most lists, you don&#039;t forsake games like Baldur&#039;s Gate because it has no blaring electric guitars. No Fallout games is a bit of a disappointment, and Morrowind was pretty damn good as well. But I couldn&#039;t agree with your 1st choice more. Chrono Trigger shits all over FF7. I mean, FF7 was good the first time. I&#039;ve never played it since. I end up going back to CT every few years, and still love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG FF7 IS THE BESTESTESTESTESTETS EVERS. </p>
<p>Anyways, Good list. I thoroughly enjoy that unlike most lists, you don&#8217;t forsake games like Baldur&#8217;s Gate because it has no blaring electric guitars. No Fallout games is a bit of a disappointment, and Morrowind was pretty damn good as well. But I couldn&#8217;t agree with your 1st choice more. Chrono Trigger shits all over FF7. I mean, FF7 was good the first time. I&#8217;ve never played it since. I end up going back to CT every few years, and still love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerald Magus</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-43318</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerald Magus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-43318</guid>
		<description>Vintage Junkie: I couldn&#039;t agree with you more.  I love when people play video games for the &quot;story&quot;.  I play games to have fun.  If I want a story I&#039;ll go read a book.  (something most people don&#039;t have the patience for anymore).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vintage Junkie: I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  I love when people play video games for the &#8220;story&#8221;.  I play games to have fun.  If I want a story I&#8217;ll go read a book.  (something most people don&#8217;t have the patience for anymore).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vintage Junkie</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-43317</link>
		<dc:creator>Vintage Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-43317</guid>
		<description>@Keefy: I love how whenever FF7 isn&#039;t number one on such and such a list, some 12 year old comes out and starts crying about it.  Honestly, that game has no re-play value whatsoever.  Not only that, but the first time I played it I got bored about 1/4 of the way through.  I&#039;m so sick of these RPGs that have to combine some technology into a fantasy world.  Could that be anymore cliched?  Why can&#039;t they just make good old fashioned fantasy games anymore?  

Diablo, a game you criticize, can be replayed ad-infinitum, thanks to its randomized maps.  And I love how you point out how it has no story.  What, are you saying FF7 on par with Tolkien or something?  (Wait, you&#039;ve probably never read a book by Tolkien, but know all about LoTR from watching the movies).  

Also I couldn&#039;t be happier about not seeing any fall out games on this list.  It sounds to me like you see a game rated highly on IGN and decide its gotta be the best game ever made and you go out and buy it.  Maybe you should pick up some old classic RPGs like FF3 and then criticize this list coming from a standpoint of knowledge about what you&#039;re talking about.

Secret of Mana is epic just for the fact that it is a 3 player game.  My friends and I beat it once every few years together and it gives us a couple of weeks of amazing fun.  And Chrono Trigger being number one is beyond dispute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keefy: I love how whenever FF7 isn&#8217;t number one on such and such a list, some 12 year old comes out and starts crying about it.  Honestly, that game has no re-play value whatsoever.  Not only that, but the first time I played it I got bored about 1/4 of the way through.  I&#8217;m so sick of these RPGs that have to combine some technology into a fantasy world.  Could that be anymore cliched?  Why can&#8217;t they just make good old fashioned fantasy games anymore?  </p>
<p>Diablo, a game you criticize, can be replayed ad-infinitum, thanks to its randomized maps.  And I love how you point out how it has no story.  What, are you saying FF7 on par with Tolkien or something?  (Wait, you&#8217;ve probably never read a book by Tolkien, but know all about LoTR from watching the movies).  </p>
<p>Also I couldn&#8217;t be happier about not seeing any fall out games on this list.  It sounds to me like you see a game rated highly on IGN and decide its gotta be the best game ever made and you go out and buy it.  Maybe you should pick up some old classic RPGs like FF3 and then criticize this list coming from a standpoint of knowledge about what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>Secret of Mana is epic just for the fact that it is a 3 player game.  My friends and I beat it once every few years together and it gives us a couple of weeks of amazing fun.  And Chrono Trigger being number one is beyond dispute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keefy</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-43316</link>
		<dc:creator>Keefy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-43316</guid>
		<description>There are some big flaws in this list...

Baldur&#039;s Gate possibly deserves to be up there, but, as Kniteli and JaySee point out, Baldur&#039;s Gate II was far superior and is certainly one of the finest RPGs ever made. Baldur&#039;s Gate was a good but flawed game, that laid the foundations for it&#039;s excellent sequel.

So you put FFVII in at number 12. Ho hum. And people have responded saying that it&#039;s overrated and it doesn&#039;t deserve to be up there. Wow. You guys should know that I and all the other RPG fans respect you loads for sticking to less popular RPGs, and for rejecting FFVII despite it clearly being the best incarnation of a Final Fantasy, and the best RPG (Possibly game, but for OoT) made so far. Still, if we underate it that makes us all look cooler, and more knowledgable, right?

No Morrowijnd or Oblivion? That&#039;s a bit controversial. No Planetscape Torment? Ooh, the fans won&#039;t like that. No Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines? What, too fps for you? Pfft. I can forgive these ommissions, but...

...NO FALLOUT GAMES? NONE?!?! Arguably the finest series of RPGs ever made, and you included NONE of them?!!? I expect the nausea of having to see the third one included at the expense of the first two, but none? Sorry, friend, but that&#039;s inexcusable.

The next two leave me in the minority, because they are unquestionably very popular, and yet I fail to see the quality in either. Diablo the fourth best RPG ever? Diablo as in the retreat and stand in doorways simulator? Diablo as in with sod all sound and music? Diablo as in no character development and practically no story? Diablo as in with character creation and upgrading far worse than the likes of BG, ID, or even the later FFs? Please folks, explain what I&#039;m missing here!
But then this is topped, by your third best RPG ever! What the hell is the deal with Secret of Mana? It&#039;s a hybrid of FF and LoZ, but it takes the worst from both camps! The fighting in SoM was the most horrible thing in the world; with about 80% of the important fights won or lost by the person who got the first hit in. Then to boot, there is no story, and no characters! The boy, the girl, the imp! They don&#039;t even have names!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some big flaws in this list&#8230;</p>
<p>Baldur&#8217;s Gate possibly deserves to be up there, but, as Kniteli and JaySee point out, Baldur&#8217;s Gate II was far superior and is certainly one of the finest RPGs ever made. Baldur&#8217;s Gate was a good but flawed game, that laid the foundations for it&#8217;s excellent sequel.</p>
<p>So you put FFVII in at number 12. Ho hum. And people have responded saying that it&#8217;s overrated and it doesn&#8217;t deserve to be up there. Wow. You guys should know that I and all the other RPG fans respect you loads for sticking to less popular RPGs, and for rejecting FFVII despite it clearly being the best incarnation of a Final Fantasy, and the best RPG (Possibly game, but for OoT) made so far. Still, if we underate it that makes us all look cooler, and more knowledgable, right?</p>
<p>No Morrowijnd or Oblivion? That&#8217;s a bit controversial. No Planetscape Torment? Ooh, the fans won&#8217;t like that. No Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines? What, too fps for you? Pfft. I can forgive these ommissions, but&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;NO FALLOUT GAMES? NONE?!?! Arguably the finest series of RPGs ever made, and you included NONE of them?!!? I expect the nausea of having to see the third one included at the expense of the first two, but none? Sorry, friend, but that&#8217;s inexcusable.</p>
<p>The next two leave me in the minority, because they are unquestionably very popular, and yet I fail to see the quality in either. Diablo the fourth best RPG ever? Diablo as in the retreat and stand in doorways simulator? Diablo as in with sod all sound and music? Diablo as in no character development and practically no story? Diablo as in with character creation and upgrading far worse than the likes of BG, ID, or even the later FFs? Please folks, explain what I&#8217;m missing here!<br />
But then this is topped, by your third best RPG ever! What the hell is the deal with Secret of Mana? It&#8217;s a hybrid of FF and LoZ, but it takes the worst from both camps! The fighting in SoM was the most horrible thing in the world; with about 80% of the important fights won or lost by the person who got the first hit in. Then to boot, there is no story, and no characters! The boy, the girl, the imp! They don&#8217;t even have names!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azelfknight</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-42373</link>
		<dc:creator>Azelfknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-42373</guid>
		<description>Finally a list on this site I can completely agree with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a list on this site I can completely agree with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-42128</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-42128</guid>
		<description>This list can go suck it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list can go suck it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briana Renee</title>
		<link>http://old-wizard.com/top-15-rpgs-of-all-time/comment-page-4#comment-41919</link>
		<dc:creator>Briana Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://old-wizard.com/?p=2008#comment-41919</guid>
		<description>Wow! Thanks for putting Diablo on! Best RPG ever!!! &lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thanks for putting Diablo on! Best RPG ever!!! &lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
