- Ian on Top 10 Most Powerful Superheroes of All Time
- Charles B. on Top 10 Famous People Who Shouldn’t Be Famous
- Felix on Top 10 Bands of The 90’s
- al on Top 10 80’s Cartoons
- ShadowHunter on Top 10 Most Powerful Superheroes of All Time
- Ronan M on Top 10 Worst Video Games of All Time
- big guns on Top 10 Most Powerful Superheroes of All Time
- Pete on Top 10 Most Powerful Superheroes of All Time
- Ask Old-Wizard: Star Trek Part 2 | Old-Wizard.com on Ask Old-Wizard: Star Trek Edition
- Keepinitreal on Top 10 Worst Fanboys
-
Interpreting Pac-Man
I came across a great article about different interpretations of Pac-Man which references Old-Wizard’s Top 10 Arcade Games List.
Here’s a quote:
“Old Wizard’s Interpretation about Unity for a Common Goal or Some Shit
Drawn from Old Wizard’s recent countdown of the top arcade games, this one is the least cogent interpretation I’ve seen, though it is compelling because it places emphasis solely on the ghosts and it draws most literally from the game’s “text.” I quote it in its entirety:
While there is no background story or disernable plot, woven into the game is a complicated philosophy. The four villanious cast members: Inky, Pinky, Blinky and Clyde share a commonality: They are united kinsmen who have placed a jihad on Pac-man. Aside from the ghost’s differences in naming, they maintain a unified front once they emerge from their crypt to chase Pac-man. Together they stand. Clyde, with his uncharacteristic name is held in the same esteem by the other ghosts. Pinky, questionably a female, is given the same voting rights as the rest. Together they stand, divided they fall. The lesson learned is that you should be accepting of differences when you are united with a common goal, even if you’re named Clyde, who made me wet the bed at night as a child. Pac-man: The most basic arcade game out there, revered by the adults that suckled on its tender joystick in their youth, yet all the while teaching us a lesson that can change the world, if we all just learned to accept Clyde.
This is a playful interpretation. It’s not meant to be taken seriously, but it is remarkable for its faithfulness.”
Check out the full article here.
4 Comments
Leave a Comment
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- April 2007
- January 2007
- Cathode Tan
- Computers Avenue
- Donkey Gamer
- Fix My Internet Now
- Flash of Steel
- Flying Omelette
- Game Drone
- Game Guy Thinks
- Game Lemon
- Game Usagi
- Geek and Nerd Blog
- Geek Eye Glasses
- Girls Don’t Game
- Gnome’s Lair
- Greg Stones
- In Between Days
- Mario Monsters
- New PSP
- Oh Hey There
- On Nintendo
- Once Upon a Geek
- Online Ninja Training
- Only The Games
- Press the Buttons
- Resigned Gamer
- SlapStic
- The Absinthe Review Network
- The Artful Gamer
- The Average Gamer
- The Blogging Gamers
- The Contented Cynic
- The Pulperizer
- The Ramblings of an Idle Mind
- Towards Mecca
- Troll and Toad
- Video Game Geek


November 20th, 2009 at 7:34 pm
Thanks for the reference! I wrote that Pac-Man post. Here’s an article suggestion for you guys: Best Pieces of Gaming Literature.
November 20th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Not this piece of crap thats for sure!
November 20th, 2009 at 4:11 am
What piece of crap? This site or my article?
November 20th, 2009 at 1:38 am
Your article is great this website sucks!